Part Two of Abbas Amanat’s Lecture Series on the Intertwined Dualities and the Challenges of Modernity in Iran. Abbas Amanat argues that the interplay between Iran and Aniran (non-Iran) represents one of the most enduring dualities in Iranian identity, reflecting historical, cultural, and ideological development layers. Through his analysis, Amanat traces the evolution of these terms from their ancient etymological roots to their symbolic and political manifestations in modern Iran. His argument emphasizes how this duality has been shaped by geography, literary traditions, religious dynamics, and external pressures, creating a lens through which Iranian identity can be understood.

Etymology and Geography: The Foundation of Iran and Aniran

Amanat traces the origins of Iran to its etymological connection with the ancient Aryan identity. Derived from the Old Persian term Aryanam Khshathra, meaning “kingdom of the Aryans,” Iran initially referred to a cultural and political domain rooted in notions of kinship and nobility. Its counterpart, “Aniran,” encompassed lands and peoples beyond this realm without the antagonistic overtones the term would later acquire. 

Amanat emphasizes the importance of geography in shaping the concept of Iran Zamin (ایران زمین), or the “land of Iran.” Defined by natural barriers such as the Zagros Mountains, Central Asian deserts, and the Caspian Sea, these boundaries fostered a sense of unity among the diverse peoples within the plateau. Amanat argues that this geographic unity contributed to a shared cultural identity, even as political divisions and tribal rivalries persisted.

Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh and the Literary Codification of Duality

According to Amanat, Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh plays a pivotal role in defining the symbolic dimensions of Iran and “Aniran.” The epic portrays Iran as the land of order and civilization, represented by figures such as Jamshid and Keykhosrow, while Aniran, typified by Turan, embodies chaos and existential threat. Amanat notes that the conflict between Iran and Turan is not merely a geopolitical rivalry but a cultural and moral dichotomy, with Turan as the archetypal “other” challenging the stability of Iran. 

Amanat underscores how Ferdowsi’s narrative reinforces the centrality of Iran as a bastion of cultural resilience. The symbolic struggle between Iran and its periphery mirrors the broader historical tensions between settled civilizations and nomadic societies. In doing so, the Shahnameh codifies the Iran–Aniran dichotomy as a foundational narrative of Iranian identity. 

The Islamic Era: Cultural Resilience and Transformation

Amanat argues that the Islamic conquest of Iran in the 7th century CE marked a profound turning point in the Iran–Aniran dynamic. While Islam reshaped Iranian governance, language, and society, the cultural memory of Iran as a distinct entity persisted. Through the continued use of Persian as a literary and administrative language, Iran maintained its unique identity within the broader Islamic world. Amanat highlights how pre-Islamic traditions were adapted and preserved, ensuring the survival of Iran’s historical consciousness. 

In this period, Amanat identifies a significant shift in the meaning of Aniran. No longer solely a geographic or tribal “other,” it began to reflect religious and ideological differences, particularly as Iran’s Shia identity diverged from the Sunni Caliphates that dominated the Islamic world.

Safavid Iran: Religion as a Defining Boundary

Amanat emphasizes the transformative role of the Safavid dynasty in redefining the Iran–Aniran dichotomy. By establishing Shia Islam as the state religion, the Safavids created a new ideological boundary, positioning Iran in opposition to Sunni powers such as the Ottoman Empire and the Uzbeks. Amanat notes that this alignment gave Aniran a pronounced religious dimension, extending its meaning to include those outside the Safavid ideological framework. 

The Safavids’ efforts to consolidate power and promote Persianate culture further solidified this division. Amanat argues that under the Safavids, Iran emerged as a geographic and cultural entity and a religious and ideological bastion, reinforcing its distinctiveness within the Islamic world. 

Modernity and the Redefinition of Aniran

In Amanat’s analysis, the 19th and 20th centuries saw significant changes in the Iran–Aniran dynamic. The encroachment of European imperial powers like Russia and Britain introduced new external threats, redefining Aniran to include Western imperial actors. Amanat highlights how this shift reflected the geopolitical realities of the time, with traditional rivals such as Turan replaced by imperial powers as existential threats.

Simultaneously, internal movements for modernization and reform sought to redefine Iran as a cohesive nation-state. Amanat argues that intellectuals of the Constitutional Revolution and subsequent nationalist movements invoked the “Iran”-Aniran dichotomy to promote unity against foreign domination. This period, he asserts, marked a reimagining of Iranian identity, balancing historical legacy with the demands of modernity. 

Conclusion: A Duality with Enduring Relevance

Amanat concludes that the concepts of Iran and Aniran have evolved over millennia, serving as a lens through which Iranian identity has been articulated. From the geographic contours of the Iranian plateau to the symbolic narratives of the Shahnameh and the ideological boundaries of the Safavid era, this duality reflects the complexities of Iran’s historical consciousness. 

Amanat warns that the disruption of this dynamic in the modern era, whether through external pressures or internal transformations, risks eroding the balance that has long defined Iranian identity. By revisiting the interplay of Iran and Aniran, he calls for a deeper understanding of the historical and cultural forces that continue to shape Iran’s worldview and strategies for survival in a changing world. 

Through his exploration, Amanat demonstrates how this enduring duality remains central to the Iranian imagination, offering insights not only into the past but also into the challenges and opportunities of the present.

---

In line with the vision of the Iran 1400 Project, which aims to explore the evolution of ideas and institutions in Iran over the past century to foster informed discussions about its future, we are pleased to share a summary of Abbas Amanat’s lecture series titled “Intertwined Dualities and the Challenge of Modernity in Iran.” This series was produced by Aasoo, a non-profit organization affiliated with the Tasselmi Foundation. Aasoo promotes dialogue and tolerance through research, publications, and multimedia initiatives, fostering understanding and inclusion within Iranian society. We extend our gratitude to our friends at Aasoo for facilitating this enlightening lecture series, which addresses the complex challenges of modernity in Iran.

The lectures are conducted in Farsi, and the Iran 1400 Project provides a summary and key takeaways of each lecture in English to engage a broader audience.

• Overview of Abbas Amanat’s Lecture Series on “Intertwined Dualities and the Challenge of Modernity in Iran”
• Part 1: The Evolution of Bum and Bar in Iran